Process Mapping Examples

Process mapping comes in many forms. There are several different types of process
mapping which you may decide to use for your business.

Different Types of Process Mapping

There are a few key different types of process mapping that businesses may use. Some
business process mapping solutions are determined by the type of process you are trying to
lay out. You may find that one style of process mapping works for specific types of
processes over another.

Flow Chart

Tratech Consulting Process Mapping can help you create flow charts to map out complex
processes in an organised and efficient manner.

A flow chart helps you visually represent a
process step-by-step to ensure that you are able to identify, document, and improve all of
the tasks involved. It can be used for both business-to-business and direct-to-customer
processes, as well as for project management teams.

Positives

  • Clarity: Flowcharts provide a clear and concise way to represent complex processes, making it easy to understand how a system works.
  • Standardization: Flowcharts use a standardized set of symbols and conventions, making it easy for different people to create and read them.
  • Communication: Flowcharts provide an effective way to communicate complex ideas and processes to others.
  • Analysis: Flowcharts can help identify inefficiencies, redundancies, and bottlenecks in a process, allowing for improvements to be made.
  • Planning: Flowcharts can be used to plan and design new processes or systems.

Negatives

  • Complexity: Flowcharts can become very complex, especially for large or complicated processes. This can make them difficult to read and understand.
  • Time-consuming: Creating and updating flowcharts can be a time-consuming process, especially if the process being mapped is complex or constantly changing.
  • Limited scope: Flowcharts may not be suitable for representing processes that are highly dynamic or involve a lot of human decision-making.
  • Risk of oversimplification: Flowcharts can oversimplify a process by focusing on the mechanical steps while ignoring the human element.
  • Risk of misinterpretation: Flowcharts can be misinterpreted or misread, leading to misunderstandings and errors in the process.

High-Level Process Mapping

Our high-level process mapping is perfect for larger organisations that need to understand
the entire process from start to finish. This type of mapping helps to break down the entire
process into smaller, manageable tasks, ensuring that each step is properly documented
and tracked. It is also great for identifying areas for improvement and streamlining processes
for increased efficiency.

Positives

  • Clarity: High-level process mapping provides a clear and simplified overview of a process, allowing stakeholders to quickly understand the main components and objectives of the process.
  • Alignment: High-level process mapping can be used to ensure that all stakeholders have a shared understanding of the process, allowing for better alignment and collaboration.
  • Communication: High-level process mapping provides an effective way to communicate the overall structure and goals of a process to stakeholders, including those who may not have a deep understanding of the process.
  • Simplification: High-level process mapping can help simplify complex processes, making them more manageable and easier to understand.
  • Strategic alignment: High-level process mapping can help align processes with broader strategic goals, ensuring that they are focused on delivering value to the organization.

Negatives

  • Lack of detail: High-level process mapping provides a simplified overview of a process, which may not include all the details needed to fully understand the process.
  • Risk of oversimplification: High-level process mapping may oversimplify the process, leading to misunderstandings or errors.
  • Limited scope: High-level process mapping may not provide a detailed enough view of the process to identify specific inefficiencies or improvement opportunities.
  • Risk of misalignment: High-level process mapping may not accurately reflect the needs and goals of all stakeholders, leading to misalignment and potential conflicts.
  • Limited actionable insights: High-level process mapping may not provide enough detail to generate actionable insights or recommendations for process improvement.

Detailed Process Mapping

Our detailed process mapping helps to break down a process into even smaller tasks,
allowing you to identify and document specific processes at each step of the way. This type
of mapping is great for project management teams, as it helps to ensure that each task is
completed correctly and on time. It also helps to identify areas for improvement and
streamline processes for increased efficiency.

Positives

  • Comprehensive view: Detailed process mapping provides a comprehensive view of a process, including all the steps and decision points involved.
  • Identification of inefficiencies: Detailed process mapping can help identify inefficiencies and bottlenecks in the process, enabling targeted improvements.
  • Consistency: Detailed process mapping ensures that all stakeholders have a clear and consistent understanding of the process, reducing the risk of miscommunication or errors.
  • Analysis: Detailed process mapping enables detailed analysis of the process, allowing for data-driven decision-making.
  • Optimization: Detailed process mapping can help optimize the process, ensuring that it is as efficient and effective as possible.

Negatives

  • Complexity: Detailed process mapping can be complex and time-consuming, especially for processes that involve a large number of steps and decision points.
  • Limited scope: Detailed process mapping may not provide a holistic view of the process, focusing instead on the individual steps and decision points.
  • Cost: Detailed process mapping can be expensive, requiring significant time and resources to complete.
  • Risk of micromanagement: Detailed process mapping may lead to micromanagement of the process, reducing autonomy and creativity among stakeholders.
  • Difficulty of maintenance: Detailed process mapping requires ongoing maintenance and updates to remain relevant and effective, which can be challenging in dynamic environments.

Swimlane Map and Value Stream Map

Tratech Consulting Process Mapping also offers swimlane maps and value stream maps,
which are ideal for larger organisations that need to understand the entire process from start
to finish. These maps help you visually represent a process step-by-step, while also helping
to identify areas for improvement and streamline processes for increased efficiency. The
swimlane map shows the order of tasks and the value stream map shows the flow of the entire process. Finally, our SIPOC diagram can be used to analyse each process in order to
create more efficient systems.

Positives

  • Clarity: Swimlane mapping provides a clear and visual representation of a process, making it easy to understand the roles and responsibilities of different stakeholders.
  • Collaboration: Swimlane mapping encourages collaboration between different stakeholders, promoting a shared understanding of the process.
  • Identification of inefficiencies: Swimlane mapping can help identify inefficiencies and bottlenecks in the process, enabling targeted improvements.
  • Communication: Swimlane mapping provides an effective way to communicate the process to stakeholders, including those who may not have a deep understanding of the process.
  • Simplification: Swimlane mapping can help simplify complex processes, making them more manageable and easier to understand.

Negatives

  • Complexity: Swimlane mapping can become complex and difficult to read for processes with a large number of stakeholders.
  • Limited scope: Swimlane mapping may not provide a holistic view of the process, focusing instead on the individual roles and responsibilities of stakeholders.
  • Risk of miscommunication: Swimlane mapping may not accurately reflect the needs and goals of all stakeholders, leading to miscommunication and potential conflicts.
  • Cost: Swimlane mapping can be expensive, requiring significant time and resources to complete.
  • Limited actionable insights: Swimlane mapping may not provide enough detail to generate actionable insights or recommendations for process improvement.

(B2B) Business to Business process mapping

For business-to-business applications, process mapping can help with the elicitation of
business requirements, provide insight to potential technology improvements, reduce costs,
and ultimately improve customer satisfaction. By mapping out the process, you can more
easily identify bottlenecks, compare your processes with what you think your employees are
doing and what they are actually doing. This can result in happier employees, greater
customer satisfaction, fewer customer complaints, and increased sales.

Positives

  • Clarity: B2B process mapping provides a clear and visual representation of the process, making it easy to understand the steps involved in a transaction between two businesses.
  • Alignment: B2B process mapping can help align processes between two businesses, ensuring that both parties are working towards the same goals.
  • Identification of inefficiencies: B2B process mapping can help identify inefficiencies and bottlenecks in the process, enabling targeted improvements.
  • Communication: B2B process mapping provides an effective way to communicate the process to stakeholders, including those who may not have a deep understanding of the process.
  • Continuous improvement: B2B process mapping is an iterative process, enabling continuous improvement over time.

Negatives

  • Complexity: B2B process mapping can be complex and time-consuming, especially for processes that involve a large number of steps and decision points.
  • Limited scope: B2B process mapping may not provide a holistic view of the business relationship between the two parties, focusing instead on the individual steps and decision points involved in a transaction.
  • Risk of miscommunication: B2B process mapping may not accurately reflect the needs and goals of all stakeholders, leading to miscommunication and potential conflicts.
  • Cost: B2B process mapping can be expensive, requiring significant time and resources to complete.
  • Limited actionable insights: B2B process mapping may not provide enough detail to generate actionable insights or recommendations for process improvement.

Direct to Customer process mapping

For direct-to-customer solutions, process mapping can help you to articulate a customer
journey more easily, determine the pain points and work more efficiently to identify what their
needs are. By mapping out the process, you can identify areas where you can improve
customer experience and create a better customer journey, streamlining the idea-to-delivery
process. Resulting in better brand awareness and higher customer loyalty.

Positives

  • Control: D2C process mapping provides businesses with more control over the entire customer experience, from product development to delivery and post-purchase support.
  • Customer-focused: D2C process mapping puts the customer at the center of the process, enabling businesses to deliver a personalized and seamless experience.
  • Data-driven decision-making: D2C process mapping enables data-driven decision-making, allowing businesses to make informed decisions about product development, marketing, and customer support.
  • Brand building: D2C process mapping enables businesses to build their brand directly with their customers, creating a strong and loyal customer base.
  • Continuous improvement: D2C process mapping is an iterative process, enabling continuous improvement over time.

Negatives

  • Limited reach: D2C process mapping may limit a business’s reach to customers who are willing to purchase directly from the business, potentially excluding customers who prefer to shop through third-party retailers.
  • Higher costs: D2C process mapping may require higher initial investment costs for product development, marketing, and logistics, compared to selling through third-party retailers.
  • Logistics: D2C process mapping requires businesses to manage the logistics of product delivery and post-purchase support, which can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Risk of miscommunication: D2C process mapping may not accurately reflect the needs and goals of all customers, leading to miscommunication and potential conflicts.
  • Limited actionable insights: D2C process mapping may not provide enough detail to generate actionable insights or recommendations for process improvement.

Project Management process mapping

In project management, process mapping can help you to identify any potential problems
that could arise and develop solutions to deal with them. By mapping out the process, you
can identify areas of potential failure and develop contingency plans to help ensure project
success. This can result in fewer delays and better project outcomes.

Positives

  • Clarity: Project management process mapping provides a clear and visual representation of the project process, making it easy to understand the steps involved in delivering a project.
  • Alignment: Project management process mapping can help align project objectives with business goals, ensuring that the project is delivered on time and within budget.
  • Identification of inefficiencies: Project management process mapping can help identify inefficiencies and bottlenecks in the project process, enabling targeted improvements.
  • Communication: Project management process mapping provides an effective way to communicate the project process to stakeholders, including team members, project sponsors, and external partners.
  • Continuous improvement: Project management process mapping is an iterative process, enabling continuous improvement over time.

Negatives

  • Complexity: Project management process mapping can be complex and time-consuming, especially for projects that involve a large number of stakeholders, dependencies, and risks.
  • Limited scope: Project management process mapping may not provide a holistic view of the project, focusing instead on the individual steps and decision points involved in delivering the project.
  • Risk of miscommunication: Project management process mapping may not accurately reflect the needs and goals of all stakeholders, leading to miscommunication and potential conflicts.
  • Limited flexibility: Project management process mapping may limit the flexibility of the project team to respond to unexpected events or changes in the project scope.
  • Cost: Project management process mapping can be expensive, requiring significant time and resources to complete.

Get in touch